born on the 4th of july Essay -- essays research papers

Born on the Fourth of JulyThis disk was flimsy In all truth this was the foremost book I sustain ever read cover to cover. The book, by Ron Kovic, as compared to the film, by Oliver Stone, had some(prenominal) impressive similarities. Both the book and the film did a great caper of portraying Rons childhood in Massapequa, Long Island. From the little confederacy games to playing war in the woods, leading charges and setting ambushes. This was especially well up done in the movie, and exactly as I pictured them epoch reading the book. The time that he spent in Mexico was well specify in the book as well as in the film. opus in that location were many similarities, what I feel is more important is to rivet on the differences.There were countless small differences in the film as compared to the book, things such as shuffling the order in which chapters appeared in the film. For example, the head start of the film took a disparate path than the stock of the book. In the book the first chapter set the tone for the rest of the book, describing the firefight and all that had gone wrong, burn into your mind the thought of Ron Kovic lying on the ground bleeding, paralyzed, screaming for tending and hearing people get shot all around him. The beginning of the film is a different story all together. It gives you hope, it lulls you into believing that this is a happy story, the kind where everything always works out in the end. It is not until after the accurate buildup of the character, after you feel as if you know him, that you fit this scene. The accidental killing of the civilians, the baby, the killing of the corporal, all these things happen before you catch out that this soldier, this Marine, will come home paralyzed.The film makes it a academic degree to show that there was an on-going, pseudo romance between Ron and Joan Marfe. The two of them gorgerin on his birthday, Ron running to the prom and showing up soaking wet, intercommunicate h er for a dance. Finding her after the war and going to a stand with her. None of these things were anywhere in the book, in fact the book besides mentioned her once, and in that mentioning Ron said that he was always too nervous to bring her for a date. The film completely leaves out Rons marriage to Helen and his entire time in California. As for the reasons that Ron joined the Marine core there were some interesting and important differences. The film leads you to belie... ...girl whom he has known since first grade. The book mentions a girl want this, once, but she has a different name, and Ron doesnt ever talk to her. Also, the entire prom scene seemed to be made up to aid in the progression of the love story, sounds like dramatic license or artistic freedom to me.There were sooner a few other books mentioned in History by Hollywood, but I felt that they were all portrayed and critiqued fairly. I shew it reassuring that Toplin was more concerned nearly educating the reade r that movies were a entire thing for history, while they are not always completely accurate, they do expand the minds of the people viewing them. If it was not for Pearl obtain or Saving Private Ryan, an entire generation could have forgotten about World War II. I would even go as faraway as to say that in 50 years there will be a movie such as Pearl Harbor about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Movies are an important agency of our lives, they can be used as a teaching tool, or as a means of remembrance, but they will always be used. I just hope that the people watching them dont take them as fact, but take them as a al-Qaida to learn more about what really happened.