The Revolutions of 1848 Essay -- World History Revolution Essays

The Revolutions of 1848 The Revolutions of 1848 brook been described as the greatest revolution of the light speed1. From its mild beginnings in Palermo, Sicily in January 1848, it did not take long to banquet across the rest of Europe (Britain and Russia were the only countries not to experience such revolutions). In 1848 more states on the European continent were overcome by revolution than ever before and ever since2. The Revolutions became more chemical group except later on June 1848 these revolutionary events began to overlap with those of counterrevolutionary actions, thus enabling the oldish regimes to return to power. 1848 was described as a sunny spring of the peoples absolutely interrupted by the winter of the princes3.It has often been saidthat in 1848European history reached its turning point and failed to turn4. There are a variety of reasons that can be given for the failure of the Revolutions, these include the divisions amongst revolutionaries, the invetera te social and economic problems of the countries involved, the exhaustingy in replacing the old regimes and the problem of the new inexperienced electorates. There does not appear to be one(a) clear, defining reason which led to the old regimes regaining power after the 1848 Revolutions. All the factors seem to be equ bothy important and to some extent, connected.crosswise Europe, the revolutionaries of 1848 came from a variety of different social backgrounds and they all held different political beliefs. They could be liberals, republicans, nationalists or socialists and therefore they all lossed different things erupt of the Revolutions. Each group was also internally divided, with a radical faction and a more moderate one. Initially they all joined forces to turn over the existing regimes with which they were discontent. However once power was in their hands, they found that subverter Consensus was virtually impossible. Their initial victory was followed by ensuing struggl e to work through change5. The people had taken to the streets not knowing what they would do if they did oversee to take power. Now that they had, because of their different individual aims, they found it hard to compromise. This in conclusion led to a growing split between moderates and radicals, as rise as between social classes, particularly in France. The moderates did not want a government based on universal male... ... voted into the new republic. France was a republic, but one now in the hands of an assembly dominated by conservatives, many of whom were monarchists7.As you can see all these factors enabled the ultraconservative regimes to return to power after the 1848 Revolutions. I do not return that one was more influential than another but that they are all connected. Perhaps without one, another may not have had such an effect. For example, the humanity of social and economic difficulties increased the divisions between the revolutionaries. They found it increa singly difficult to agree with one another on how to combat them, let only be able to compromise on a new contour of government. Also if the new widened franchise had not been so inexperienced the revolutionaries would have had an easier time replacing the old regimes, which had in fact not been that toughened to start with. The reactionary regimes regained power so quickly because of all of these reasons and although the 1848 Revolutions had emphatic the ineptitude and impotence8 of the old sovereigns and governments, they brought with them too many resentments, grudges and radical changes, for which Europe was not yet ready.